Development of Physics Electronic Modules Using the Trait–Treatment Interaction Model Based on Next Generation Science Standards
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/jpion.v4i4.770Keywords:
CEDs, Electronic Module, NGSS, TTIAbstract
This research aims to develop a physics electronic module using the Trait Treatment Interaction (TTI) model based on the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) to improve students' ability to Construct Explanations and Design Solutions (CEDs) and to test its effectiveness on the topic of Environmental Pollution for grade X SMA/MA. The study uses a Research and Development (R&D) method with the 4D model (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate). The Define stage includes front-end, student, task, and concept analysis, while the Design stage involves preparing instruments and selecting media. The Develop stage consists of validation by content, media, and language experts, followed by product trials with educators and students, and the Disseminate stage focuses on distributing the effective product. The research subjects were 34 students of class X.I MAN 2 Pesisir Selatan. The findings show that the developed e-module is of very high quality and highly valid, with an average score of 89.24% from expert validators, while its practicality level reached 88.97% based on evaluations from educators and students. The e-module also proved very effective in improving students’ CEDs abilities, indicated by an average test score of 90%. High-ability students (faster learners) experienced significant improvement through self-learning, whereas low-ability students (slower learners) benefited more from regular teaching accompanied by additional tutorials. Based on these results, it is recommended that the e-module be further developed for other physics topics, and future researchers are encouraged to optimize time efficiency to ensure a smoother learning process without disrupting the predetermined duration.
References
Achmad, M. (2022). Konstruksi Penjelasan Ilmiah dan Desain Solusi dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Jakarta: Penerbit Edukasi Sains.
Amin, N. F., Garancang, S., & Abunawas, K. (2023). Konsep umum populasi dan sampel dalam penelitian. Jurnal Pilar, 14(1), 15–31.
Anderson, C. W., & Siford, L. (2013). Supporting students' use of evidence in science: Learning progressions and pedagogical implications. In D. Kritt & M. J. Zembylas (Eds.), Learning and instruction in the 21st century: The challenges for science education (pp. 165-188). Springer.
Arkadiantika, I., Ramansyah, W., Effindi, M. A., & Dellia, P. (2020). Pengembangan media pembelajaran virtual reality pada materi pengenalan termination dan splicing fiber optic. Jurnal Dimensi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 8(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.24269/dpp.v0i0.2298
Aswirna, & Harahap, A. (2020). Desain media pembelajaran interaktif berbasis aplikasi android pada materi momentum dan impuls. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika dan Pembelajaran, 1(1), 30-37.
Aswirna, P. (2018). Application of treatment trait interaction to improve learning of chemistry. SHS Web of Conferences, 42, 00114. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200114
Aswirna, P., & Harahap, K. (2020). The Android-Based Learning Media Using The Trait Treatment Interaction Model as Implementation of Industrial Era 4.0. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1594(1), 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1594/1/012024
Aswirna, P., Wardani, T., Asrar, A., Fahmi, R., & Fahmi, D.M. (2024). Designing a Thermochemistry E-Module Based on the Trait Treatment Interaction Educational Model for Madrasah Aliyah Students. JTK: Jurnal Tadris Kimiya 9, 1. 102-112 https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v9i1.30924
Bybee, R. W. (2014). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins and Effectiveness. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.
Cahyanti, T. O., Sukarmin, S., & Ashadi, A. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Siswa Dalam Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions Materi Gerak Dan Gaya. Edusains, 11(2), 163172. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v11i2.10674
Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington Publishers.
Fahmi, R., Tusa'diah, H., Aswirna, P., & Sabri, A. (2020). Pengembangan keterampilan kolaborasi melalui penerapan modul interaktif berbasis TTI. Natural Science: Jurnal Penelitian Bidang IPA dan Pendidikan IPA, 6(2), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.15548/nsc.v6i2.1932
Galitskaya, A., & Batzaka, E. (2022). Gifted education: A review of literature. European Journal of Psychology and Educational Research, 5(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejper.5.2.xx
Lee, J. (2013). Development of an adaptive learning system with multiple perspectives based on students' learning styles and cognitive styles. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 185-200.
Logan, A., White, J., & Smith, K. (2021). Student engagement in online learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology, 18(3), 200-215.
McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Supporting Grade 5-8 students in constructing explanations in science: The Claim, Evidence, and Reasoning framework for talk and writing. Pearson Prentice Hall.
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting Students’ Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153-191.
Nacaroğlu, F., & Bektaş, S. (2023). Differentiated instruction in gifted education: Adapting strategies for individual needs. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 10(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jgce.v10i1.xxx
National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
OECD. (2018). The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran, Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Laporan Hasil Asesmen Nasional Tahun 2022. Jakarta: Kemendikbudristek.
Putra, N. (2015). Research & Development Penelitian dan Pengembangan: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, H., ... & Krajcik, J. (2017). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Elementary and middle school investigations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(5), 585-611.
Widiyasari, R., Astriyani, A., & Irawan, K. V. (2020). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan Bantuan Media Evaluasi Thatquiz. Fibonacci: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 68-76. https://doi.org/10.21009/Fibonacci.V6I2.16434
Yuliantari, D., Ikhsan, J., & Wilujeng, I. (2023). Pengembangan instrumen validasi produk multimedia pembelajaran fisika. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 227-236. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpf.v6i2.60749
Yulianti, E., & Wati, M. (2021). Analisis Model Pembelajaran Fisika di Sekolah Menengah Atas: Studi Kasus di Kota X. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 10(1), 45-56.
Zangori, L., Chou, R., & Phelps, K. (2017). Connecting scientific explanations to models in elementary science: Teacher perspectives. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(6), 565-585.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rahmi Tania Putri, Prima Aswirna, Allan Asrar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.















