Penilaian Autentik dalam Pembelajaran Akuntansi: A systematic Literature Review

Authors

  • Retno Ayu Nawangwulan Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
  • Sudiyanto Sudiyanto Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jpion.v5i3.1453

Keywords:

penilaian autentik, pembelajaran akuntansi, systematic literature review, PRISMA 2020

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) menganalisis konsep dan jenis penilaian autentik dalam pembelajaran akuntansi, (2) menganalisis pola tren penggunaan dari tahun ke tahun, dan (3) mengidentifikasi faktor pendukung dan penghambat implementasinya. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR) mengacu pada pedoman PRISMA 2020. Data berupa artikel ilmiah dari database Scopus melalui aplikasi Watase UAKE menggunakan 16 kombinasi kata kunci pada rentang publikasi 2016–2026. Dari 136 artikel yang teridentifikasi, 16 artikel memenuhi kriteria inklusi dan dianalisis menggunakan sintesis naratif tematik. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa simulasi merupakan jenis penilaian autentik yang paling banyak dilaporkan, diikuti self-assessment, work-integrated learning (WIL), dan transformasi modalitas asesmen dengan frekuensi yang sama; dua di antaranya merupakan kategori baru yang muncul secara induktif bersama produk kreatif berbasis media. Ketika dipetakan pada lima dimensi autentisitas Gulikers, Bastiaens, dan Kirschner (2004), WILhanya menempati posisi paling autentik, sementara simulasi hanya memenuhi sebagian dimensi. Pola tren penggunaan bersifat nonlinier dengan puncak publikasi pada tahun 2022 yang berkaitan dengan disrupsi pandemi COVID-19. Faktor pendukung yang paling konsisten adalah scaffolding bertahap dan rubrik terstandar, sedangkan faktor penghambat yang dominan meliputi keterbatasan generalisasi, keterbatasan waktu, kendala akses/infrastruktur, dan risiko pelanggaran integritas akademik.

Author Biography

Sudiyanto Sudiyanto, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

Dr. Sudiyanto, M.Pd adalah dosen senior di Program Studi Pendidikan Akuntansi FKIP Universitas Sebelas Maret (UNS) yang memiliki keahlian utama di bidang Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Lulusan doktor dari Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta (UNY) berjabatan Lektor Kepala ini aktif mengampu mata kuliah metodologi penelitian dan evaluasi pembelajaran, serta konsisten berkontribusi dalam grup riset Inovasi dan Kreasi Pembelajaran Akuntansi untuk memajukan kualitas dunia pendidikan.

References

Ali, I., Narayan, A. K., & Gedera, D. (2022). Transforming assessment in accounting education to align with online learning. Pacific Accounting Review, 34(4), 536–547. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-05-2021-0058

Andriani, W. (2022). Communication skills mahasiswa akuntansi dan akuntan: Dua dekade studi di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 20(2), 119–135.

Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., & Brown, C. (2014). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.819566

Carenys, J., Moya, S., & Perramon, J. (2017). Is it worth it to consider videogames in accounting education? A comparison of a simulation and a videogame in attributes, motivation and learning outcomes. Revista de Contabilidad–Spanish Accounting Review, 20(2), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2016.07.003

Crawford, V., Brimble, M., & Freudenberg, B. (2024). Can work integrated learning deliver employability? International post-graduate accounting students. Accounting & Finance, 64(1), 1061–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13182

ElKelish, W. W., & Ahmed, R. (2022). Advancing accounting education using LEGO® Serious Play simulation technique. Accounting Education, 31(2), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2021.1905011

Goosen, R., & Steenkamp, G. (2023). Activating accounting students' decision-making skills through a reflective self-assessment workshop on learning styles. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(3), 100858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100858

Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504676

Halabi, A. K. (2021). Pivoting authentic assessment to an accounting podcast during COVID-19. Accounting Research Journal, 34(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-08-2020-0219

Henadirage, A., & Gunarathne, N. (2023). Retaining remote teaching and assessment methods in accounting education: Drivers and challenges in the post-pandemic era. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(3), 100810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100810

Hill, C. (2016). Do accounting students believe in self-assessment? Accounting Education, 25(4), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2016.1191271

Ismail, T. (2018). Kesenjangan harapan keterampilan yang dimiliki oleh sarjana akuntansi. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Terpadu, 11(2).

Jackson, D., & Meek, S. (2020). Embedding work-integrated learning into accounting education: The state of play and pathways to future implementation. Accounting Education, 29(2), 105–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2020.1794917

Jaffar, R., Mohd Zain, F. A., Mustafa, N. H., & Jusop, M. (2025). Simulation-based learning in accounting education: Bridging the theory-practice gap for SDG-aligned professional readiness. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-08-2025-0880

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Technical Report EBSE 2007-001). Keele University dan University of Durham.

Lewis, S., Kanani, S., Prokofieva, M., Chelliah, J., & Bavaresco, C. (2021). Developing an evaluation tool to provide a 360-degree reflection on work-integrated learning in accounting education. Accounting Education, 30(5), 507–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2021.1963994

Malan, M., & Stegmann, N. (2018). Accounting students' experiences of peer assessment: A tool to develop lifelong learning. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 32(2–3), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2018.1487503

Mueller, J. (2005). The authentic assessment toolbox: Enhancing student learning through online faculty development. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 1–7.

Nkhoma, C., Nkhoma, M., & Tu, N. (2018). Authentic assessment in accounting education. Journal of International Education in Business, 11(2), 188–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-06-2017-0018

Opdecam, E., & Everaert, P. (2022). Effect of a summer school on formative and summative assessment in accounting education. Journal of Accounting Education, 58, 100769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2022.100769

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pidduck, A., & Bauer, D. (2022). Perceptions of online self- and peer-assessment: Accounting students in a large undergraduate cohort. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(4), 1547–1564. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-03-2021-0120

Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., … Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme. ESRC Methods Programme Version, 1(1), b92.

Retnawati, H., Hadi, S., & Nugraha, A. C. (2016). Vocational high school teachers' difficulties in implementing the assessment in curriculum 2013 in Yogyakarta Province of Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.913a

Riestyananda, A., Rahmanto, A. N., & Ninghardjanti, P. (2018). Implementasi model penilaian otentik dalam pembelajaran di SMK Negeri 1 Surakarta tahun ajaran 2017/2018. Jurnal Informasi dan Komunikasi Administrasi Perkantoran, 2(5).

Roudaki, H., & Pupovac, S. (2026). Replacing final exams in first-year accounting: Reflections on implementing an authentic assessment task. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 20(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v20i1.02

Sangster, A., Stoner, G., & Flood, B. (2020). Insights into accounting education in a COVID-19 world. Accounting Education, 29(5), 431–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2020.1808487

Shauki, E. R., & Benzie, H. (2017). Meeting threshold learning standards through self-management in group oral presentations: Observations on accounting postgraduate students. Accounting Education, 26(4), 358–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2017.1300777

Tan, L. M., & Laswad, F. (2018). Professional skills required of accountants: What do job advertisements tell us? Accounting Education, 27(4), 403–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2018.1490189

Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2024). A systematic literature review on authentic assessment in higher education: Best practices for the development of 21st century skills, and policy considerations. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101425

Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 2(2), 1–5.

Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. Jossey-Bass.

World Economic Forum. (2025). The future of jobs report 2025. World Economic Forum.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-12

How to Cite

Nawangwulan, R. A., & Sudiyanto, S. (2026). Penilaian Autentik dalam Pembelajaran Akuntansi: A systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia, 5(3), 2122–2129. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpion.v5i3.1453

Issue

Section

Articles